Venhauss Reviews

Excellent rating

4.8 | 25 reviews

Verified Company

ventanaspvc.venhauss.es Visit Venhauss

Write a review

Reviews

4.8

| 25 total

5 stars

24 pcs

4 stars

0 pc

3 stars

0 pc

2 stars

0 pc

1 star

1 pc

Source filter

25 pcs

0 pc

Verified

Carolina Hidalgo Cortes 2026.04.30

Empezando por la calidad de los profesionales, continuando con la calidad de los materiales y acabando con la calidad del trabajo. Muy satisfecha con la empresa Venhauss. Buscaba aislamiento acústico y térmico y por recomendación de ellos, me instalaron ventanas de PVC con persianas integradas, y sin duda, hacerles caso ha sido todo un acierto. Prácticas y muy estéticas. Excelente servicio!

Sharon Kelly 2026.04.16

I don’t normally leave reviews, but in this case I feel it’s important to share our experience so others can make an informed decision. We engaged this company to install several fixed glass windows. Unfortunately, the experience was extremely disappointing from both a workmanship and communication perspective. From the outset, communication was poor. There was a lack of clarity around installation methods, and when questions were asked, the answers were inconsistent. After the work began, this became more concerning. The windows were initially installed using expanding foam as the primary means of support, without proper mechanical fixings into the structure. No packers/spacers were used at the base to support the frame. When this was questioned, we were given varying explanations ranging from “this is normal” to “it will be done later,” but nothing was clearly committed to in writing. We subsequently contacted the manufacturer, who confirmed that the installation method used was not correct and that mechanical anchoring into the structure is required. In addition, the work was carried out by subcontractors who stated they did not work directly for the company, and there appeared to be a lack of supervision. This resulted in confusion on site and no clear accountability for decisions being made. After we raised these concerns, Sebastian (the owner) attended the property. On his third visit, he entered, instructed the workers to stop work (“down tools”), and then left abruptly while raising his voice. This interaction is recorded on CCTV. The behaviour was unexpected and unprofessional, particularly given that the issues raised were factual and related to the quality and safety of the installation. From a regulatory standpoint, installations must meet the requirements of the Código Técnico de la Edificación (CTE), including structural stability (DB-SE) and protection against moisture (DB-HS). In our view, an installation relying primarily on foam without mechanical anchoring does not meet these performance requirements. Overall, the experience has been stressful and has required significant intervention on our part to ensure the work is completed to an acceptable standard. There were repeated excuses rather than clear solutions, and a general lack of ownership of the issues raised. I would strongly advise anyone considering this company to: - Clarify the installation method in detail before work begins - Ensure mechanical fixings are included - Confirm who is actually carrying out the work and supervising it - Get all commitments in writing Based on our experience, the workmanship, communication, and professionalism fell well below what we expected. This is how it was left

I don’t normally leave reviews, but in this case I feel it’s important to share our experience so others can make an informed decision.

We engaged this company to install several fixed glass windows. Unfortunately, the experience was extremely disappointing from both a workmanship and communication perspective.

From the outset, communication was poor. There was a lack of clarity around installation methods, and when questions were asked, the answers were inconsistent. After the work began, this became more concerning.

The windows were initially installed using expanding foam as the primary means of support, without proper mechanical fixings into the structure. No packers/spacers were used at the base to support the frame. When this was questioned, we were given varying explanations ranging from “this is normal” to “it will be done later,” but nothing was clearly committed to in writing.

We subsequently contacted the manufacturer, who confirmed that the installation method used was not correct and that mechanical anchoring into the structure is required.

In addition, the work was carried out by subcontractors who stated they did not work directly for the company, and there appeared to be a lack of supervision. This resulted in confusion on site and no clear accountability for decisions being made.

After we raised these concerns, Sebastian (the owner) attended the property. On his third visit, he entered, instructed the workers to stop work (“down tools”), and then left abruptly while raising his voice. This interaction is recorded on CCTV. The behaviour was unexpected and unprofessional, particularly given that the issues raised were factual and related to the quality and safety of the installation.

From a regulatory standpoint, installations must meet the requirements of the Código Técnico de la Edificación (CTE), including structural stability (DB-SE) and protection against moisture (DB-HS). In our view, an installation relying primarily on foam without mechanical anchoring does not meet these performance requirements.

Overall, the experience has been stressful and has required significant intervention on our part to ensure the work is completed to an acceptable standard. There were repeated excuses rather than clear solutions, and a general lack of ownership of the issues raised.

I would strongly advise anyone considering this company to:
- Clarify the installation method in detail before work begins
- Ensure mechanical fixings are included
- Confirm who is actually carrying out the work and supervising it
- Get all commitments in writing

Based on our experience, the workmanship, communication, and professionalism fell well below what we expected. This is how it was left

I don’t normally leave reviews, but in this case I feel it’s important to share our experience so others can make an informed decision.

We engaged this company to install several fixed glass windows. Unfortunately, the experience was extremely disappointing from both a workmanship and communication perspective.

From the outset, communication was poor. There was a lack of clarity around installation methods, and when questions were asked, the answers were inconsistent. After the work began, this became more concerning.

The windows were initially installed using expanding foam as the primary means of support, without proper mechanical fixings into the structure. No packers/spacers were used at the base to support the frame. When this was questioned, we were given varying explanations ranging from “this is normal” to “it will be done later,” but nothing was clearly committed to in writing.

We subsequently contacted the manufacturer, who confirmed that the installation method used was not correct and that mechanical anchoring into the structure is required.

In addition, the work was carried out by subcontractors who stated they did not work directly for the company, and there appeared to be a lack of supervision. This resulted in confusion on site and no clear accountability for decisions being made.

After we raised these concerns, Sebastian (the owner) attended the property. On his third visit, he entered, instructed the workers to stop work (“down tools”), and then left abruptly while raising his voice. This interaction is recorded on CCTV. The behaviour was unexpected and unprofessional, particularly given that the issues raised were factual and related to the quality and safety of the installation.

From a regulatory standpoint, installations must meet the requirements of the Código Técnico de la Edificación (CTE), including structural stability (DB-SE) and protection against moisture (DB-HS). In our view, an installation relying primarily on foam without mechanical anchoring does not meet these performance requirements.

Overall, the experience has been stressful and has required significant intervention on our part to ensure the work is completed to an acceptable standard. There were repeated excuses rather than clear solutions, and a general lack of ownership of the issues raised.

I would strongly advise anyone considering this company to:
- Clarify the installation method in detail before work begins
- Ensure mechanical fixings are included
- Confirm who is actually carrying out the work and supervising it
- Get all commitments in writing

Based on our experience, the workmanship, communication, and professionalism fell well below what we expected. This is how it was left

I don’t normally leave reviews, but in this case I feel it’s important to share our experience so others can make an informed decision.

We engaged this company to install several fixed glass windows. Unfortunately, the experience was extremely disappointing from both a workmanship and communication perspective.

From the outset, communication was poor. There was a lack of clarity around installation methods, and when questions were asked, the answers were inconsistent. After the work began, this became more concerning.

The windows were initially installed using expanding foam as the primary means of support, without proper mechanical fixings into the structure. No packers/spacers were used at the base to support the frame. When this was questioned, we were given varying explanations ranging from “this is normal” to “it will be done later,” but nothing was clearly committed to in writing.

We subsequently contacted the manufacturer, who confirmed that the installation method used was not correct and that mechanical anchoring into the structure is required.

In addition, the work was carried out by subcontractors who stated they did not work directly for the company, and there appeared to be a lack of supervision. This resulted in confusion on site and no clear accountability for decisions being made.

After we raised these concerns, Sebastian (the owner) attended the property. On his third visit, he entered, instructed the workers to stop work (“down tools”), and then left abruptly while raising his voice. This interaction is recorded on CCTV. The behaviour was unexpected and unprofessional, particularly given that the issues raised were factual and related to the quality and safety of the installation.

From a regulatory standpoint, installations must meet the requirements of the Código Técnico de la Edificación (CTE), including structural stability (DB-SE) and protection against moisture (DB-HS). In our view, an installation relying primarily on foam without mechanical anchoring does not meet these performance requirements.

Overall, the experience has been stressful and has required significant intervention on our part to ensure the work is completed to an acceptable standard. There were repeated excuses rather than clear solutions, and a general lack of ownership of the issues raised.

I would strongly advise anyone considering this company to:
- Clarify the installation method in detail before work begins
- Ensure mechanical fixings are included
- Confirm who is actually carrying out the work and supervising it
- Get all commitments in writing

Based on our experience, the workmanship, communication, and professionalism fell well below what we expected. This is how it was left

I don’t normally leave reviews, but in this case I feel it’s important to share our experience so others can make an informed decision.

We engaged this company to install several fixed glass windows. Unfortunately, the experience was extremely disappointing from both a workmanship and communication perspective.

From the outset, communication was poor. There was a lack of clarity around installation methods, and when questions were asked, the answers were inconsistent. After the work began, this became more concerning.

The windows were initially installed using expanding foam as the primary means of support, without proper mechanical fixings into the structure. No packers/spacers were used at the base to support the frame. When this was questioned, we were given varying explanations ranging from “this is normal” to “it will be done later,” but nothing was clearly committed to in writing.

We subsequently contacted the manufacturer, who confirmed that the installation method used was not correct and that mechanical anchoring into the structure is required.

In addition, the work was carried out by subcontractors who stated they did not work directly for the company, and there appeared to be a lack of supervision. This resulted in confusion on site and no clear accountability for decisions being made.

After we raised these concerns, Sebastian (the owner) attended the property. On his third visit, he entered, instructed the workers to stop work (“down tools”), and then left abruptly while raising his voice. This interaction is recorded on CCTV. The behaviour was unexpected and unprofessional, particularly given that the issues raised were factual and related to the quality and safety of the installation.

From a regulatory standpoint, installations must meet the requirements of the Código Técnico de la Edificación (CTE), including structural stability (DB-SE) and protection against moisture (DB-HS). In our view, an installation relying primarily on foam without mechanical anchoring does not meet these performance requirements.

Overall, the experience has been stressful and has required significant intervention on our part to ensure the work is completed to an acceptable standard. There were repeated excuses rather than clear solutions, and a general lack of ownership of the issues raised.

I would strongly advise anyone considering this company to:
- Clarify the installation method in detail before work begins
- Ensure mechanical fixings are included
- Confirm who is actually carrying out the work and supervising it
- Get all commitments in writing

Based on our experience, the workmanship, communication, and professionalism fell well below what we expected. This is how it was left

I don’t normally leave reviews, but in this case I feel it’s important to share our experience so others can make an informed decision.

We engaged this company to install several fixed glass windows. Unfortunately, the experience was extremely disappointing from both a workmanship and communication perspective.

From the outset, communication was poor. There was a lack of clarity around installation methods, and when questions were asked, the answers were inconsistent. After the work began, this became more concerning.

The windows were initially installed using expanding foam as the primary means of support, without proper mechanical fixings into the structure. No packers/spacers were used at the base to support the frame. When this was questioned, we were given varying explanations ranging from “this is normal” to “it will be done later,” but nothing was clearly committed to in writing.

We subsequently contacted the manufacturer, who confirmed that the installation method used was not correct and that mechanical anchoring into the structure is required.

In addition, the work was carried out by subcontractors who stated they did not work directly for the company, and there appeared to be a lack of supervision. This resulted in confusion on site and no clear accountability for decisions being made.

After we raised these concerns, Sebastian (the owner) attended the property. On his third visit, he entered, instructed the workers to stop work (“down tools”), and then left abruptly while raising his voice. This interaction is recorded on CCTV. The behaviour was unexpected and unprofessional, particularly given that the issues raised were factual and related to the quality and safety of the installation.

From a regulatory standpoint, installations must meet the requirements of the Código Técnico de la Edificación (CTE), including structural stability (DB-SE) and protection against moisture (DB-HS). In our view, an installation relying primarily on foam without mechanical anchoring does not meet these performance requirements.

Overall, the experience has been stressful and has required significant intervention on our part to ensure the work is completed to an acceptable standard. There were repeated excuses rather than clear solutions, and a general lack of ownership of the issues raised.

I would strongly advise anyone considering this company to:
- Clarify the installation method in detail before work begins
- Ensure mechanical fixings are included
- Confirm who is actually carrying out the work and supervising it
- Get all commitments in writing

Based on our experience, the workmanship, communication, and professionalism fell well below what we expected. This is how it was left

I don’t normally leave reviews, but in this case I feel it’s important to share our experience so others can make an informed decision.

We engaged this company to install several fixed glass windows. Unfortunately, the experience was extremely disappointing from both a workmanship and communication perspective.

From the outset, communication was poor. There was a lack of clarity around installation methods, and when questions were asked, the answers were inconsistent. After the work began, this became more concerning.

The windows were initially installed using expanding foam as the primary means of support, without proper mechanical fixings into the structure. No packers/spacers were used at the base to support the frame. When this was questioned, we were given varying explanations ranging from “this is normal” to “it will be done later,” but nothing was clearly committed to in writing.

We subsequently contacted the manufacturer, who confirmed that the installation method used was not correct and that mechanical anchoring into the structure is required.

In addition, the work was carried out by subcontractors who stated they did not work directly for the company, and there appeared to be a lack of supervision. This resulted in confusion on site and no clear accountability for decisions being made.

After we raised these concerns, Sebastian (the owner) attended the property. On his third visit, he entered, instructed the workers to stop work (“down tools”), and then left abruptly while raising his voice. This interaction is recorded on CCTV. The behaviour was unexpected and unprofessional, particularly given that the issues raised were factual and related to the quality and safety of the installation.

From a regulatory standpoint, installations must meet the requirements of the Código Técnico de la Edificación (CTE), including structural stability (DB-SE) and protection against moisture (DB-HS). In our view, an installation relying primarily on foam without mechanical anchoring does not meet these performance requirements.

Overall, the experience has been stressful and has required significant intervention on our part to ensure the work is completed to an acceptable standard. There were repeated excuses rather than clear solutions, and a general lack of ownership of the issues raised.

I would strongly advise anyone considering this company to:
- Clarify the installation method in detail before work begins
- Ensure mechanical fixings are included
- Confirm who is actually carrying out the work and supervising it
- Get all commitments in writing

Based on our experience, the workmanship, communication, and professionalism fell well below what we expected. This is how it was left

I don’t normally leave reviews, but in this case I feel it’s important to share our experience so others can make an informed decision.

We engaged this company to install several fixed glass windows. Unfortunately, the experience was extremely disappointing from both a workmanship and communication perspective.

From the outset, communication was poor. There was a lack of clarity around installation methods, and when questions were asked, the answers were inconsistent. After the work began, this became more concerning.

The windows were initially installed using expanding foam as the primary means of support, without proper mechanical fixings into the structure. No packers/spacers were used at the base to support the frame. When this was questioned, we were given varying explanations ranging from “this is normal” to “it will be done later,” but nothing was clearly committed to in writing.

We subsequently contacted the manufacturer, who confirmed that the installation method used was not correct and that mechanical anchoring into the structure is required.

In addition, the work was carried out by subcontractors who stated they did not work directly for the company, and there appeared to be a lack of supervision. This resulted in confusion on site and no clear accountability for decisions being made.

After we raised these concerns, Sebastian (the owner) attended the property. On his third visit, he entered, instructed the workers to stop work (“down tools”), and then left abruptly while raising his voice. This interaction is recorded on CCTV. The behaviour was unexpected and unprofessional, particularly given that the issues raised were factual and related to the quality and safety of the installation.

From a regulatory standpoint, installations must meet the requirements of the Código Técnico de la Edificación (CTE), including structural stability (DB-SE) and protection against moisture (DB-HS). In our view, an installation relying primarily on foam without mechanical anchoring does not meet these performance requirements.

Overall, the experience has been stressful and has required significant intervention on our part to ensure the work is completed to an acceptable standard. There were repeated excuses rather than clear solutions, and a general lack of ownership of the issues raised.

I would strongly advise anyone considering this company to:
- Clarify the installation method in detail before work begins
- Ensure mechanical fixings are included
- Confirm who is actually carrying out the work and supervising it
- Get all commitments in writing

Based on our experience, the workmanship, communication, and professionalism fell well below what we expected. This is how it was left

I don’t normally leave reviews, but in this case I feel it’s important to share our experience so others can make an informed decision.

We engaged this company to install several fixed glass windows. Unfortunately, the experience was extremely disappointing from both a workmanship and communication perspective.

From the outset, communication was poor. There was a lack of clarity around installation methods, and when questions were asked, the answers were inconsistent. After the work began, this became more concerning.

The windows were initially installed using expanding foam as the primary means of support, without proper mechanical fixings into the structure. No packers/spacers were used at the base to support the frame. When this was questioned, we were given varying explanations ranging from “this is normal” to “it will be done later,” but nothing was clearly committed to in writing.

We subsequently contacted the manufacturer, who confirmed that the installation method used was not correct and that mechanical anchoring into the structure is required.

In addition, the work was carried out by subcontractors who stated they did not work directly for the company, and there appeared to be a lack of supervision. This resulted in confusion on site and no clear accountability for decisions being made.

After we raised these concerns, Sebastian (the owner) attended the property. On his third visit, he entered, instructed the workers to stop work (“down tools”), and then left abruptly while raising his voice. This interaction is recorded on CCTV. The behaviour was unexpected and unprofessional, particularly given that the issues raised were factual and related to the quality and safety of the installation.

From a regulatory standpoint, installations must meet the requirements of the Código Técnico de la Edificación (CTE), including structural stability (DB-SE) and protection against moisture (DB-HS). In our view, an installation relying primarily on foam without mechanical anchoring does not meet these performance requirements.

Overall, the experience has been stressful and has required significant intervention on our part to ensure the work is completed to an acceptable standard. There were repeated excuses rather than clear solutions, and a general lack of ownership of the issues raised.

I would strongly advise anyone considering this company to:
- Clarify the installation method in detail before work begins
- Ensure mechanical fixings are included
- Confirm who is actually carrying out the work and supervising it
- Get all commitments in writing

Based on our experience, the workmanship, communication, and professionalism fell well below what we expected. This is how it was left

I don’t normally leave reviews, but in this case I feel it’s important to share our experience so others can make an informed decision.

We engaged this company to install several fixed glass windows. Unfortunately, the experience was extremely disappointing from both a workmanship and communication perspective.

From the outset, communication was poor. There was a lack of clarity around installation methods, and when questions were asked, the answers were inconsistent. After the work began, this became more concerning.

The windows were initially installed using expanding foam as the primary means of support, without proper mechanical fixings into the structure. No packers/spacers were used at the base to support the frame. When this was questioned, we were given varying explanations ranging from “this is normal” to “it will be done later,” but nothing was clearly committed to in writing.

We subsequently contacted the manufacturer, who confirmed that the installation method used was not correct and that mechanical anchoring into the structure is required.

In addition, the work was carried out by subcontractors who stated they did not work directly for the company, and there appeared to be a lack of supervision. This resulted in confusion on site and no clear accountability for decisions being made.

After we raised these concerns, Sebastian (the owner) attended the property. On his third visit, he entered, instructed the workers to stop work (“down tools”), and then left abruptly while raising his voice. This interaction is recorded on CCTV. The behaviour was unexpected and unprofessional, particularly given that the issues raised were factual and related to the quality and safety of the installation.

From a regulatory standpoint, installations must meet the requirements of the Código Técnico de la Edificación (CTE), including structural stability (DB-SE) and protection against moisture (DB-HS). In our view, an installation relying primarily on foam without mechanical anchoring does not meet these performance requirements.

Overall, the experience has been stressful and has required significant intervention on our part to ensure the work is completed to an acceptable standard. There were repeated excuses rather than clear solutions, and a general lack of ownership of the issues raised.

I would strongly advise anyone considering this company to:
- Clarify the installation method in detail before work begins
- Ensure mechanical fixings are included
- Confirm who is actually carrying out the work and supervising it
- Get all commitments in writing

Based on our experience, the workmanship, communication, and professionalism fell well below what we expected. This is how it was left

I don’t normally leave reviews, but in this case I feel it’s important to share our experience so others can make an informed decision.

We engaged this company to install several fixed glass windows. Unfortunately, the experience was extremely disappointing from both a workmanship and communication perspective.

From the outset, communication was poor. There was a lack of clarity around installation methods, and when questions were asked, the answers were inconsistent. After the work began, this became more concerning.

The windows were initially installed using expanding foam as the primary means of support, without proper mechanical fixings into the structure. No packers/spacers were used at the base to support the frame. When this was questioned, we were given varying explanations ranging from “this is normal” to “it will be done later,” but nothing was clearly committed to in writing.

We subsequently contacted the manufacturer, who confirmed that the installation method used was not correct and that mechanical anchoring into the structure is required.

In addition, the work was carried out by subcontractors who stated they did not work directly for the company, and there appeared to be a lack of supervision. This resulted in confusion on site and no clear accountability for decisions being made.

After we raised these concerns, Sebastian (the owner) attended the property. On his third visit, he entered, instructed the workers to stop work (“down tools”), and then left abruptly while raising his voice. This interaction is recorded on CCTV. The behaviour was unexpected and unprofessional, particularly given that the issues raised were factual and related to the quality and safety of the installation.

From a regulatory standpoint, installations must meet the requirements of the Código Técnico de la Edificación (CTE), including structural stability (DB-SE) and protection against moisture (DB-HS). In our view, an installation relying primarily on foam without mechanical anchoring does not meet these performance requirements.

Overall, the experience has been stressful and has required significant intervention on our part to ensure the work is completed to an acceptable standard. There were repeated excuses rather than clear solutions, and a general lack of ownership of the issues raised.

I would strongly advise anyone considering this company to:
- Clarify the installation method in detail before work begins
- Ensure mechanical fixings are included
- Confirm who is actually carrying out the work and supervising it
- Get all commitments in writing

Based on our experience, the workmanship, communication, and professionalism fell well below what we expected. This is how it was left

I don’t normally leave reviews, but in this case I feel it’s important to share our experience so others can make an informed decision.

We engaged this company to install several fixed glass windows. Unfortunately, the experience was extremely disappointing from both a workmanship and communication perspective.

From the outset, communication was poor. There was a lack of clarity around installation methods, and when questions were asked, the answers were inconsistent. After the work began, this became more concerning.

The windows were initially installed using expanding foam as the primary means of support, without proper mechanical fixings into the structure. No packers/spacers were used at the base to support the frame. When this was questioned, we were given varying explanations ranging from “this is normal” to “it will be done later,” but nothing was clearly committed to in writing.

We subsequently contacted the manufacturer, who confirmed that the installation method used was not correct and that mechanical anchoring into the structure is required.

In addition, the work was carried out by subcontractors who stated they did not work directly for the company, and there appeared to be a lack of supervision. This resulted in confusion on site and no clear accountability for decisions being made.

After we raised these concerns, Sebastian (the owner) attended the property. On his third visit, he entered, instructed the workers to stop work (“down tools”), and then left abruptly while raising his voice. This interaction is recorded on CCTV. The behaviour was unexpected and unprofessional, particularly given that the issues raised were factual and related to the quality and safety of the installation.

From a regulatory standpoint, installations must meet the requirements of the Código Técnico de la Edificación (CTE), including structural stability (DB-SE) and protection against moisture (DB-HS). In our view, an installation relying primarily on foam without mechanical anchoring does not meet these performance requirements.

Overall, the experience has been stressful and has required significant intervention on our part to ensure the work is completed to an acceptable standard. There were repeated excuses rather than clear solutions, and a general lack of ownership of the issues raised.

I would strongly advise anyone considering this company to:
- Clarify the installation method in detail before work begins
- Ensure mechanical fixings are included
- Confirm who is actually carrying out the work and supervising it
- Get all commitments in writing

Based on our experience, the workmanship, communication, and professionalism fell well below what we expected. This is how it was left

Useful (1) Report

jaime Garcia 2025.09.04

Un equipo profesional y un trabajo excelente.

Jaime García 2025.09.04

Maria Vico 2025.09.03

En mi casa de Jaén colocaron ventanas de PVC con doble cristal y se nota mucho la diferencia en el consumo de energía. Empresa muy profesional.

Irene Triguero Gómez 2025.09.03

Muy satisfecho con Venhauss. Las ventanas de PVC con persianas integradas que instalaron son prácticas y además muy estéticas.

Inmaculada Fernández Castarnado 2025.09.03

Tenía problemas de frío en invierno y humedad, y en Venhauss me recomendaron ventanas de PVC herméticas. Ahora mi casa está mucho más confortable.

marta morales 2025.09.03

Trabajo de 10!

Davinia Moraguez Aviles 2025.09.03

Si buscas puertas de aluminio modernas y ventanas buenas, Venhauss es la mejor opción. Me colocaron varias en mi piso y el acabado es perfecto. Compré un pisito en Málaga y los elegí por recomendación y genial.

Macarena Alcazar Cobo 2025.09.03

Venhauss me instaló unas puertas de aluminio para exteriores y han quedado espectaculares. Materiales de primera y muy buena atención.

maria del mar moreno pardo 2025.09.03

Recomiendo Venhauss. Pusieron unas ventanas de PVC abatibles en mi piso y ahora el ruido de la calle prácticamente no se escucha. Excelente servicio.

Silvia Vidal 2025.09.03

Me he quedado muy satisfecha con Venhauss. Me instalaron ventanas de PVC y el cambio en aislamiento acústico y térmico ha sido increíble. Profesionales y serios.

Elvira Sánchez 2024.12.20

La verdad es que he quedado muy contenta con ellos, son profesionales y muy rápidos, no dudaré en recomendarlos.

Useful (1) Report

Pilar Guerrero Ruiz 2024.08.02

jose jesus fernandez garcia 2024.03.23

Empresa con unas calidades excepcionales y un servicio muy profesional, la atención fue muy buena y el trato por parte de la vendedora un acierto en todo. Recomiendo 100%.

Useful (1) Report

Claudia Bassani huertas 2024.03.21

Gran empresa de ventanas con una calidad inmejorable y muy buen servicio lo recomiendo 100 %

Useful (1) Report

Carolina Ruiz Jiménez 2024.03.21

Encantada con la atención, el trato personal, y la calidad de los productos. Los volvería a elegir mil veces más!

Eva Cabello 2024.03.21

Lucia Calvo benitez 2024.03.18

Lola Cruz Veredas 2024.03.18

Company activity

Claimed Profile
Top Rated Certificate

About Venhauss

Poligono Tecnologico, Nave 73, 18151 Ogíjares, Granada, Spain

TOP 5 Trustindex Features

100+ Review Platforms

40 Breathtaking review widgets

Easy review collection

Review image generator

Review e-mail signatures

Create a Free account