written at month three
Ten months in and the review I would write today is not very different from the one I would have written at month three. That consistency cuts both ways. The payouts are consistently real, the rules are consistently fair, and the execution is consistently acceptable. The support is consistently slow, the platform is consistently unchanged, and the post funding engagement is consistently absent. A firm that improves the second three earns a fundamentally different rating and I remain genuinely willing to update this one if that day arrives.
Date of experience: 12 June, 2026
Date of experience: 12 June, 2026