The Wallpaper Hangers Reviews

It makes our hearts smile when our clients are happy with our work!

Thank you! That's our mission to do well what we get paid for!

Wallpaper could be an expensive investment. Always be sure to research the reviews of your installation company.

Thank you very much for your patronage

Hi Divya, It was a pleasure working with you. We see ourselves as ladies and gentlemen serving other ladies and gentlemen. We have we made everything simpler by introducing our one-stop-shop mobile app- For all your wallpaper needs, from purchase of wallpaper to installation and after service care.

Yes, we know that many of our customers work during the week and can only do work on their houses on the weekends. We do schedule customers on Saturdays. We try not to work on Sundays but we make exceptions if the work needs to be done before the weekend ends. We have just introduced our one-stop-shop mobile app- For all your wallpaper needs, from purchase of wallpaper to installation and after service care.

Yes, we sell some of the highest quality wallpaper brands. Those brands are sold 'to-the-trade' only because they require a white glove service from purchase to install and after service. This is the grade of service those high-end brands require for a flawless, seem-less experience. And at the same time saving customers money by not ordering excess wallpaper. We have just introduced our one-stop-shop mobile app- For all your wallpaper needs, from purchase of wallpaper to installation and after service care.

Thank you Sofia! Our process is designed as to avoid any inconvenience to the clients. We have just introduced our one-stop-shop mobile app- For all your wallpaper needs, from purchase of wallpaper to installation and after service care.

Ms Graham, prides herself for being a self righteous person who champions many great causes. She is the Chief Equity Officer of Omnicom. An organization that champions and advances diversity and inclusion. She is also a board of trustees in the Institute for Public Relations (IPR). However, the professional image of truth and equality that Ms. Graham portrays is anything but that. She is slanderous and heinous to such a degree that she abondons her integrity and resorts to lies to feed her heinous nature. Below, I will dissect the review she submitted to Google and I will prove to the readers point by point the degree she is willing to go to advance her lies. * Ms. Graham wrote that "I called her out of my name". And "second grader" penmanship. I did not call Ms. Graham any name. There was no penmanship that I received from her as her own personal penmanship that I could qualify as second grade penmanship. I was referring to the numbers and letters jotted by hand on a handheld device, which do no reflect a person's penmanship. Because jotting on a tablet or phone is by its own nature the way it is. And it is those jots that caused the error in calculating the number of rolls. And I yes I referred to those jots as second grade. I did not say or mean that Ms. Graham writes like a second grader because I never saw her own writing with pen and paper. * Despite the error that could have been shared, as soon as it became obvious that I ordered more wallpaper than needed. On the same day of the install I agreed to take that extra wallpaper back at my own cost And my chief project manager can attest to that fact. So this is completely slanderous. * Ms Graham wrote: "This is my main point- mostly for women- he is chauvinistic, arrogant, and misogynistic". How does Ms. Graham knows how I deal with women. She says 'mostly for women', that means that she has seen my interactions with many women and many men and has concluded that I am a chauvinist, a misogynist and that I act differently with men and women. Although I never even met Ms Graham in person, or in a group setting to draw these conclusions. So this is slander too. * Ms Graham said: "He chooses to outsource cheap labor, pay them pennie's on the dollar and call it good business". This statement means that Ms Graham has a deep insight in the salaries of my employee, and she knows that my employees are 'cheap labor'. So this slander too. * Ms Graham wrote that: "He is taking advantage of these kind of people and they are REALLY good". How does Ms Graham know and what type of measure she uses to access that I am 'taking advantage' of my employees. What does taking advantage mean from a wage standpoint. Does she know that wages of construction labor varies by supply and demand and also skills. Does she know the hourly wage I pay them, does she know how much I pay my employees compared to the minimum state and federal rate., does she know how much I pay the person who manages my employees. Or does she know my company's hierarchy. So this is slanderous too. * Ms. Graham wrote: "Hire them directly - do yourself a favor". How does She know if I hire or contract or do both at the same time. How can Ms Graham make that decision for employees who prefer to stay independent or direct hire. How could she know that employees would make more money as direct hire. Most workers prefer to stay independent contractors because the rate for contractors are higher and it is hard to estimate future demand and what companies have enough projects. That way, they can choose to transfer constantly between construction companies and make the most money as opposed to stay attached to one single company and run the risk to be furloughed if business is slow. * Ms Graham wrote: "If it had been in person I would have called the police". At best this not even admissible because it is "speculation" and if it had actually happened in reality, it could have resulted in 'making false statements to a police officer'