6000 dollars a year ? Not worth 60 dollars a year
For starters Siam Kidd is not a winning trader he’s a losing one who seeks to extract as much capital from his customers as possible . He spent the entire time upselling his additional fund DsV before shilling ridiculous price predictions that never get hit to his group who lack critical thinking skills to think for themselves . Siam will berate anyone who shares good content one member actually shared a telegram which had the correct exit plan and Siam berated him for it. Siam’s plans then resulted into a loss whilst the telegram that the other member wanted to post was correct
He just wants to upsell and capital extract the people who follow him as much as possible. He doesn’t care about alternate views and constantly berates those who go against him. 100 percent avoid at all costs
I’ve attached screenshots so people know I’m a real member paying members as I have had access to Siam’s discord in the past and taking evidence to base my arguments against him
Dato for erfaring: 04 December, 2025
Dato for erfaring: 04 December, 2025
Svar fra The Realistic Trader
2026.04.21
We strongly and unequivocally disagree with every claim made in this review, which is both misleading and taken heavily out of context.
First, the assertion that Siam is a “losing trader” who exists to “extract capital” is simply false. Siam trades his own capital transparently and shares both winning and losing positions openly — something most so-called “educators” avoid. Markets are inherently volatile, and no trader is correct 100% of the time, but reducing years of thesis-driven positioning and public track record to blanket statements like this is not an honest assessment.
The accusation of constant “upselling” is also inaccurate. Any additional offerings, such as DSV, are clearly optional and entirely separate from the core RT membership. They are not pushed as solutions to losses, nor are members pressured into joining. The core RT offering stands on its own as an educational and community-based service.
Regarding “ridiculous price predictions,” this again shows a misunderstanding of how Siam communicates. Price targets are discussed as forward-looking scenarios based on evolving market theses, not guarantees. As conditions change, views are updated — that is not backtracking, it is responsible market analysis.
The claim that Siam “berates” members or shuts down alternative views is also a distortion. RT is a direct and intellectually honest environment where ideas are challenged — including Siam’s own. However, low-quality or misaligned content may be moderated to maintain focus. One isolated disagreement, presented here without context, does not reflect how the community operates as a whole.
As for the screenshots, we have seen repeated attempts across multiple reviews to present selective snippets of Discord conversations as “evidence.” Without full context, timelines, or understanding of the discussion, these are misleading at best and intentionally deceptive at worst.
Finally, the statement that the service is “not worth $6000” is entirely subjective and contradicted by many members who have found significant value in the insights, frameworks, and long-term thinking provided. RT is not a signals group or a shortcut to profit — it requires engagement, effort, and personal responsibility.
This review reads as another exaggerated and one-sided account that fails to reflect the reality of the service or the broader member experience.
Kind Regards
The RT Team
First, the assertion that Siam is a “losing trader” who exists to “extract capital” is simply false. Siam trades his own capital transparently and shares both winning and losing positions openly — something most so-called “educators” avoid. Markets are inherently volatile, and no trader is correct 100% of the time, but reducing years of thesis-driven positioning and public track record to blanket statements like this is not an honest assessment.
The accusation of constant “upselling” is also inaccurate. Any additional offerings, such as DSV, are clearly optional and entirely separate from the core RT membership. They are not pushed as solutions to losses, nor are members pressured into joining. The core RT offering stands on its own as an educational and community-based service.
Regarding “ridiculous price predictions,” this again shows a misunderstanding of how Siam communicates. Price targets are discussed as forward-looking scenarios based on evolving market theses, not guarantees. As conditions change, views are updated — that is not backtracking, it is responsible market analysis.
The claim that Siam “berates” members or shuts down alternative views is also a distortion. RT is a direct and intellectually honest environment where ideas are challenged — including Siam’s own. However, low-quality or misaligned content may be moderated to maintain focus. One isolated disagreement, presented here without context, does not reflect how the community operates as a whole.
As for the screenshots, we have seen repeated attempts across multiple reviews to present selective snippets of Discord conversations as “evidence.” Without full context, timelines, or understanding of the discussion, these are misleading at best and intentionally deceptive at worst.
Finally, the statement that the service is “not worth $6000” is entirely subjective and contradicted by many members who have found significant value in the insights, frameworks, and long-term thinking provided. RT is not a signals group or a shortcut to profit — it requires engagement, effort, and personal responsibility.
This review reads as another exaggerated and one-sided account that fails to reflect the reality of the service or the broader member experience.
Kind Regards
The RT Team